Analyses 23 April 2022 EU economic governance between crises: broken taboos in search of political institutionalization By Francesco Corti and Cinzia Alcidi The pandemic represented a turning point of the debate on the European economic governance. All in all, the combination of existential (public health) crisis and experiential learning from the errors of the Great Recession led EU policymakers, along with the Commission and the ECB at the helm and with strong support from the European Parliament, to adopt a more solidaristic approach to respond to the COVID-19 crisis. In such a context, four taboos were temporarily broken, thus opening the room for a debate on the future of economic governance for the EU.
Analyses 16 November 2020 Towards a Next Generation EU for an inclusive recovery? By Francesco Corti, David Rinaldi and Christian Morabito The Next Generation EU represents a unique opportunity that must be seized in order to guarantee a fair and inclusive recovery that meets citizens’ expectations. The design of the national recovery strategies and their implementation is essentially what will determine the fate of the Next Generation EU initiative.
Policy focus 31 July 2020 SURE: What about a permanent instrument? By Francesco Corti and Cinzia Alcidi Short-time work (STW) schemes have proved to be the ace of Member States’ response to the social and employment crisis induced by the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this scenario, the proposal of the Commission for a temporary Support to mitigate Unemployment Risks in an Emergency (SURE), is to be welcomed as a bold and innovative move. Is the time ripe for the Commission to put the proposal forward for a permanent SURE?
Policy focus 17 April 2020 Are we SURE? A critical assessment of the Commission’s proposal for temporary Support to mitigate Unemployment Risks in an Emergency By Francesco Corti and Cinzia Alcidi On 1 April, the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, announced the proposal to create a new instrument for temporary Support to mitigate Unemployment Risks in an Emergency (SURE), to allow for financial aid in the form of loans from the Union to those Member States which are facing sudden increases in public expenditure for the preservation of employment.
Political visions 18 November 2019 Luci sul lavoro: a festival on the future of the labour market – prospects in Italy and the EU By Francesco Corti From the 11th to the 13th of July 2019, policymakers and public intellectuals met in Montepulciano to debate the recent developments of labour market policy from the perspective of European social policy.
Special Issue 3 May 2019 The European (Social) Union is in need of a ‘Social Imbalances Procedure’ By Francesco Corti, Sebastiano Sabato and Bart Vanhercke The Social Imbalance Procedure would use the redefined indicators included in the Pillar’s Social Scoreboard, in accordance with the analysis provided in the annual Joint Employment Report. Countries displaying ‘critical situations’ in one or more of the five policy areas mentioned above would be encouraged by the European Commission to request the Social Imbalance Procedure.
Policy focus 11 April 2018 Tripartite Social Summit 2018: difficulties on the horizon – A report By Francesco Corti and Patrik Vesan What emerged from the Tripartite Social Summit is a general convergence around the Social Fairness Package. The difficulties on the horizon, however, are manifold.
Policy focus 20 December 2017 Social policy in the EU: state of play 2017. A high-level debate report By Francesco Corti The volume "Social policy in the EU: state of play 2017", published by the European Social Observatory (OSE) and the European Trade Union Institute (ETUI) has been at the centre of a high-level debate hosted by the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC), in Brussels. Euvision's full discussion report.
Policy focus 12 December 2017 EU Pillar of Social Rights: what comes after Gothenburg? By Patrik Vesan and Francesco Corti Some months ago, the President of the EC said that the Social Pillar would be "the last chance for (Social) Europe". If this is true, claiming, as it happened in Gothenburg, that the EPSR is "a step in the right direction" is not sufficient.